Notice Information
Notice Title
Planning and Heritage Consultancy
Notice Description
Planning and Heritage Consultancy services RIBA Stages 0 - 7
Lot Information
Lot 1
Planning and Heritage Consultancy Services RIBA Stages 0 - 7. Additional information: The workstreams are subject to funding being secured along with planning permission and listed building consent being obtained. The works will be signed off to proceed at each RIBA works stage subject to these variables.
Notice Details
Publication & Lifecycle
- Open Contracting ID
- ocds-h6vhtk-042a00
- Publication Source
- Find A Tender Service
- Latest Notice
- https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/016539-2024
- Current Stage
- Award
- All Stages
- Tender, Award
Procurement Classification
- Notice Type
- Tender Notice
- Procurement Type
- Standard
- Procurement Category
- Services
- Procurement Method
- Open
- Procurement Method Details
- Open procedure
- Tender Suitability
- Not specified
- Awardee Scale
- SME
Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV)
- CPV Divisions
71 - Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services
-
- CPV Codes
71240000 - Architectural, engineering and planning services
Notice Value(s)
- Tender Value
- £6,723,364 £1M-£10M
- Lots Value
- Not specified
- Awards Value
- Not specified
- Contracts Value
- £7,315,000 £1M-£10M
Notice Dates
- Publication Date
- 24 May 20241 years ago
- Submission Deadline
- 2 Feb 2024Expired
- Future Notice Date
- Not specified
- Award Date
- 18 Apr 20241 years ago
- Contract Period
- 31 Mar 2024 - 30 May 2026 2-3 years
- Recurrence
- Not specified
Notice Status
- Tender Status
- Complete
- Lots Status
- Cancelled
- Awards Status
- Active
- Contracts Status
- Active
Buyer & Supplier
Contracting Authority (Buyer)
- Main Buyer
- BRITTEN PEARS ARTS
- Contact Name
- Ken Baines
- Contact Email
- kbaines@brittenpearsarts.org
- Contact Phone
- +44 7970161832
Buyer Location
- Locality
- SAXMUNDHAM
- Postcode
- IP17 1SP
- Post Town
- Ipswich
- Country
- England
-
- Major Region (ITL 1)
- TLH East (England)
- Basic Region (ITL 2)
- TLH6 Suffolk
- Small Region (ITL 3)
- TLH63 East Suffolk
- Delivery Location
- TLH1 East Anglia
-
- Local Authority
- East Suffolk
- Electoral Ward
- Rendlesham & Orford
- Westminster Constituency
- Suffolk Coastal
Further Information
Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS)
View full OCDS Record for this contracting process
The Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) is a framework designed to increase transparency and access to public procurement data in the public sector. It is widely used by governments and organisations worldwide to report on procurement processes and contracts.
{
"tag": [
"compiled"
],
"id": "ocds-h6vhtk-042a00-2024-05-24T17:38:41+01:00",
"date": "2024-05-24T17:38:41+01:00",
"ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-042a00",
"initiationType": "tender",
"tender": {
"id": "ocds-h6vhtk-042a00",
"legalBasis": {
"id": "32014L0024",
"scheme": "CELEX"
},
"title": "Planning and Heritage Consultancy",
"status": "complete",
"classification": {
"scheme": "CPV",
"id": "71240000",
"description": "Architectural, engineering and planning services"
},
"mainProcurementCategory": "services",
"description": "Planning and Heritage Consultancy services RIBA Stages 0 - 7",
"value": {
"amount": 6723364,
"currency": "GBP"
},
"lots": [
{
"id": "1",
"description": "Planning and Heritage Consultancy Services RIBA Stages 0 - 7. Additional information: The workstreams are subject to funding being secured along with planning permission and listed building consent being obtained. The works will be signed off to proceed at each RIBA works stage subject to these variables.",
"contractPeriod": {
"startDate": "2024-04-01T00:00:00+01:00",
"endDate": "2026-05-30T23:59:59+01:00"
},
"hasRenewal": false,
"submissionTerms": {
"variantPolicy": "notAllowed"
},
"hasOptions": false,
"status": "cancelled",
"awardCriteria": {
"criteria": [
{
"name": "Award questions",
"type": "quality",
"description": "60"
},
{
"name": "Price and resources",
"type": "cost",
"description": "40"
}
]
}
}
],
"items": [
{
"id": "1",
"deliveryAddresses": [
{
"region": "UKH1"
},
{
"region": "UKH1"
}
],
"deliveryLocation": {
"description": "Snape Maltings, Snape IP17 1SP"
},
"relatedLot": "1"
}
],
"submissionMethod": [
"electronicSubmission"
],
"submissionMethodDetails": "http://www.brittenpearsarts.org",
"documents": [
{
"id": "economic",
"documentType": "economicSelectionCriteria"
},
{
"id": "technical",
"documentType": "technicalSelectionCriteria"
}
],
"otherRequirements": {
"requiresStaffNamesAndQualifications": true
},
"procurementMethod": "open",
"procurementMethodDetails": "Open procedure",
"tenderPeriod": {
"endDate": "2024-02-02"
},
"submissionTerms": {
"languages": [
"en"
]
},
"awardPeriod": {
"startDate": "2024-02-05T17:00:00Z"
},
"bidOpening": {
"date": "2024-02-05T17:00:00Z"
},
"hasRecurrence": false,
"amendments": [
{
"id": "1",
"description": "Tender Clarification Number 1. Box link included below for submission of Tenders https://app.box.com/f/4dbc04b8978b4e4a81c2dcbb1f59f1bc This link is to be used for tender submissions and is timed to close in line with the closing date published in the ITT and notice. Note Tenders are not to be sent via BPA website or direct to any BPA email addresses."
},
{
"id": "2",
"description": "Tender Clarification Number 2 Q1. Would it be acceptable to BPA to have separate appointments for heritage and planning services? Alan Baxter Limited and The Planning Lab have collaborated very successfully on this basis on a number of similar cultural projects (including some managed by Sarah Younger). A1. We already have multiple other disciplines and therefore wish to appoint this as one not splitting the responsibilities. Q2.The Link in Appendix B1 is a link to the CIC scope of services not the CIC Consultants Contract Conditions. Could you please confirm this is intended to refer to the CIC Consultants Contract Conditions first edition 2007 or the CIC Consultants Contract Conditions second edition 2011? A2. Major works second edition Q3.Section 8 of the Invitation to Tender asks for EL, PL and PI Insurances of PS10m each. For heritage and planning services of this type and scale, PS5m is the usual maximum requirement. Can you please confirm that PS5m would be acceptable? A3. PI requirement is set at PS10M and we are not looking to reduce it. Q4.Other than the Conservation Area Appraisal, is there a Conservation Plan or other existing report which details the history and significance of the site, or will it be necessary for this to be produced from scratch by the heritage consultant? A4. Historic England undertook a review and provided a site list entry for multiple buildings at Snape Maltings in May 2022 detailing the history and significance of the buildings on the site. Q5. Is there a survey of land uses across the site? A5. Previous plans were prepared showing land use and will be made available post appointment for reference but these are likely to need updating. Q6.The Scope of Services requires planning and heritage input up to RIBA Stage 7, however the scope and number of planning/listed building consent conditions is not yet known, and nor do we know how many 'subsequent necessary further discharges' [item 7.2] (i.e. amendment applications) might be required. Would it therefore be acceptable to provide an estimate for our input from RIBA 4 onwards, based on our experience of similar projects? Alternatively, could we agree a cap on the number of condition and amendment submissions for pricing purposes? A6. Experience should allow the tenderers to assess the likely requirements. We are seeking fixed price submissions and not looking to impose caps or defined numbers on amendments or submissions. Q7. How much notice do you need, if one of us would like to visit the site (and will it be possible to access areas affected by the proposals which are not publicly accessible? A7. You will appreciate multiple visits on going so please contact directly to confirm a date / time available. We will be able to facilitate access to multiple areas if not in use on the day."
},
{
"id": "3",
"description": "Tender Clarification Number 3 Q1. Would it be acceptable to BPA to have separate appointments for heritage and planning services? A1. We already have multiple other disciplines and therefore wish to appoint this as one not splitting the responsibilities. Q2.The Link in Appendix B1 is a link to the CIC scope of services not the CIC Consultants Contract Conditions. Could you please confirm this is intended to refer to the CIC Consultants Contract Conditions first edition 2007 or the CIC Consultants Contract Conditions second edition 2011? A2. Major works second edition Q3.Section 8 of the Invitation to Tender asks for EL, PL and PI Insurances of PS10m each. For heritage and planning services of this type and scale, PS5m is the usual maximum requirement. Can you please confirm that PS5m would be acceptable? A3. PI requirement is set at PS10M and we are not looking to reduce it. Q4.Other than the Conservation Area Appraisal, is there a Conservation Plan or other existing report which details the history and significance of the site, or will it be necessary for this to be produced from scratch by the heritage consultant? A4. Historic England undertook a review and provided a site list entry for multiple buildings at Snape Maltings in May 2022 detailing the history and significance of the buildings on the site. Q5. Is there a survey of land uses across the site? A5. Previous plans were prepared showing land use and will be made available post appointment for reference but these are likely to need updating. Q6.The Scope of Services requires planning and heritage input up to RIBA Stage 7, however the scope and number of planning/listed building consent conditions is not yet known, and nor do we know how many 'subsequent necessary further discharges' [item 7.2] (i.e. amendment applications) might be required. Would it therefore be acceptable to provide an estimate for our input from RIBA 4 onwards, based on our experience of similar projects? Alternatively, could we agree a cap on the number of condition and amendment submissions for pricing purposes? A6. Experience should allow the tenderers to assess the likely requirements. We are seeking fixed price submissions and not looking to impose caps or defined numbers on amendments or submissions. Q7. How much notice do you need, if one of us would like to visit the site (and will it be possible to access areas affected by the proposals which are not publicly accessible? A7. You will appreciate multiple visits on going so please contact directly to confirm a date / time available. We will be able to facilitate access to multiple areas if not in use on the day."
},
{
"id": "4",
"description": "Tender Clarification Number 4 Q1 Form of tender: Paragraph 4 - We confirm that we agree the contract and undertake that in the event of our tender being accepted to execute the contract with XX weeks (Contractor to insert) form the date on which we receive notification that our tender is successful and, in the interim, provide the works in accordance with the contract. Can you please confirm what you mean when you refer to 'execute the contract'. Is this the length of time we propose it will take us to carry out the specific works/services that we are bidding for or is it when we could commence the work following successful appointment? A1. This relates to the length of time proposed to carry out the specific workstreams / services identified following on from appointment"
},
{
"id": "5",
"description": "Tender Clarification Number 5 Q1 Is there a required font type/size which needs to be used for the tender submission? A1 No Q2 Is there an indicative budget for the planning and heritage work? A2 Appendix H Fee Summary tab identified the over all budget construction value (excluding VAT) of PS7,315,000 - to assist further the value anticipated per workstream is CH1 PS1,597,000 CH2 PS1,005,364 CH3 PS546,000 BP1 PS2,062,000 FLD2 PS125,000 HR1 PS497,532 HR2 PS200,737 HR3 PS226,367 AC1 PS720,000 AC3 PS100,000 AD1 PS60,000 AD2 PS175,000 Q3 Could you please provide more information on what is required on the request for 'examples of value management in the construction phase' stipulated under Section 4 of the Quality Evaluation? Our involvement in this stage or projects is usually limited, so would be helpful to understand more information about what is required here. A3 The Planning / heritage role is a pivotal role in securing planning permission and listed building consent and then ensuing this is delivered through to occupation. The scope of services RIBA Stage 5 in the ITT sets out the works envisaged in this phase and we need you to show examples of how you have supported maximising construction budget - examples could be grouping and early determination of discharge applications to support timely construction (samples sign off / approvals) and limiting discharge costs, through to setting up an agenda for early inspections to verify compliance to avoid abortive works etc. Q4 Does the client have a target number of planning/listed building consent applications they would like to achieve the works in? We will be able to advise on this as needed if successful, but if there is indicative phasing that would be helpful to understand. A4 Appendix H shows the indicative timeline and the individual workstreams are likely to be treated separately as regards applications but no target number has been set. Q5 We understand that a fixed fee is sought for this scope of works, though we will need to include reasonable assumptions and limitations in our fee proposal to allow for unforeseen issues which may arise, leading to protraction of the scope and associated works. Would this be acceptable? A5 We are seeking fixed fee submissions and we are not looking to set a \"cap\" or limit on number of applications. Q6 Can the contract examples requested under Section 7 be the same as the case studies provided for Section 2 of the Quality Evaluation? A6 We have no objection to the same case studies being used subject to them being relevant and providing demonstration of the experience required"
},
{
"id": "6",
"description": "Tender Clarification Number 6 Q1 Has any heritage work been carried out as part of the master planning stage, and are there any documents which can be shared from this? A1 Tender Clarification Number 3 responded to a similar request - link included for ease https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/001712-2024 We are looking to appoint the Planning / Heritage Consultant from RIBA stage 0 so whilst previous documents may be available we are looking to ensure we move forward with updated new documents Q2 Is there an opportunity from the same project to quote for the archaeological study/survey for the same workstreams? A2 The Design Responsibility Matrix identifies that the need for both desktop and survey studies are to be determined as the projects progresses and we are not seeking a quote for these at this time. Q3 I've seen that there are Arb and Eco requirements - are there any tender opportunities for those disciplines? A3 We have multiple tender notices out for various discipline - you should register directly with FindaTender and Contract Finder to identify if they are of interest and to also see all notices issue. Please note if you have been advised of opportunities via a third party then not all notice links may have carried forward so directly registering is the only way of ensuring you are aware of all notices and updates."
},
{
"id": "7",
"description": "Tender Clarification Number 7 Q1 Would you be able to please provide the Selection Questionnaire along with the Appendix D, E and F, as a word document? A1 We have multiple documents across a significant number of disciplines so a decision was made at the outset that we are not making any alternative formats available"
},
{
"id": "8",
"description": "Tender Clarification Number 8 An issue has been identified with the Appendix H pricing schedule affecting the summary sheet of the collection page. An updated pricing schedule can be obtained from kbaines@brittenpearsarts.org or alternatively submission of the original document can be made and this will be corrected at marking / review stage"
}
]
},
"parties": [
{
"id": "GB-COH-00980281",
"name": "Britten Pears Arts",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "Britten Pears Arts",
"id": "00980281",
"scheme": "GB-COH"
},
"address": {
"streetAddress": "Snape Maltings Concert Hall",
"locality": "Saxmundham",
"region": "UKH14",
"postalCode": "IP171SP",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
"contactPoint": {
"name": "Ken Baines",
"telephone": "+44 7970161832",
"email": "kbaines@brittenpearsarts.org",
"url": "https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/kxvii03ygozv7gfvoix27/h?rlkey=qh4n5curelzzgndmpe2jte53n&dl=0"
},
"roles": [
"buyer"
],
"details": {
"url": "http://www.brittenpearsarts.org",
"classifications": [
{
"scheme": "TED_CA_TYPE",
"description": "Cultural Charity"
},
{
"scheme": "COFOG",
"description": "Charity"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "GB-FTS-525",
"name": "High Court",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "High Court"
},
"address": {
"locality": "London",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
"roles": [
"reviewBody"
]
},
{
"id": "GB-COH-OC344553",
"name": "Bidwells LLP",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "Bidwells LLP",
"id": "OC344553",
"scheme": "GB-COH"
},
"address": {
"locality": "Cambridge",
"region": "UKH12",
"countryName": "United Kingdom"
},
"roles": [
"supplier"
],
"details": {
"scale": "sme"
}
}
],
"buyer": {
"id": "GB-COH-00980281",
"name": "Britten Pears Arts"
},
"language": "en",
"description": "Awarded Contract Score Quality 48 Price 29.89 Total 77.89",
"awards": [
{
"id": "016539-2024-1",
"relatedLots": [
"1"
],
"status": "active",
"suppliers": [
{
"id": "GB-COH-OC344553",
"name": "Bidwells LLP"
}
]
}
],
"contracts": [
{
"id": "016539-2024-1",
"awardID": "016539-2024-1",
"status": "active",
"value": {
"amount": 7315000,
"currency": "GBP"
},
"dateSigned": "2024-04-19T00:00:00+01:00"
}
],
"bids": {
"statistics": [
{
"id": "1",
"measure": "bids",
"relatedLot": "1",
"value": 5
}
]
}
}