Notice Information
Notice Title
New Scots Refugee Integration Evaluation
Notice Description
The aims of the evaluation are to: - Evaluate the New Scots strategy and approach, including whether the New Scots outcomes, objectives and actions are being met. - Assess the implementation of the AMIF-funded projects, including the extent to which they are achieving their intended outcomes. - Support funded projects to develop their own self-evaluation, and support sharing of learning between funded projects. - Generate insight, learning and recommendations from the projects and New Scots in relation to good practice, widening impact and innovation, including exploration of what has worked well and what hasn't. - Present and communicate findings and outputs in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including for policymakers and practitioners. The outputs of this work, alongside the other research and learning activity being carried out, will form part of a series of outputs from the AMIF-funded programme which are intended to contribute to a resource or 'exemplar' that will be useful to others working in this field, and which can be referred to as an example international good practice in refugee integration. It will also contribute to the existing evidence-base on refugee integration and help to guide the future New Scots approach in Scotland. A range of potential questions for the evaluation have been identified, both in relation to the evaluation of the New Scots strategy (Table 1) and the evaluation of the AMIF-funded projects (Table 2), which provide a starting point for types of questions the evaluation should seek to answer. The questions draw on the evaluation questions set out in the MEL framework and cover three key areas: process, outcomes, and learning. It should be noted that the questions identified do not need to be taken as a definitive list, but should instead act as a guide to the sort of questions we would anticipate the evaluation to address in order to meet the overarching aims outlined above. Tenderers are free to modify, add to, or replace questions in the proposed list, providing that a clear rationale is given, and it is apparent how the alternatives will address the evaluation aims.
Lot Information
Lot 1
The successful supplier will fulfil the aims of the evaluation which are to: - Evaluate the New Scots strategy and approach, including whether the New Scots outcomes, objectives and actions are being met. - Assess the implementation of the AMIF-funded projects, including the extent to which they are achieving their intended outcomes. - Support funded projects to develop their own self-evaluation, and support sharing of learning between funded projects. - Generate insight, learning and recommendations from the projects and New Scots in relation to good practice, widening impact and innovation, including exploration of what has worked well and what hasn't. - Present and communicate findings and outputs in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including for policymakers and practitioners. The outputs of this work, alongside the other research and learning activity being carried out, will form part of a series of outputs from the AMIF-funded programme which are intended to contribute to a resource or 'exemplar' that will be useful to others working in this field, and which can be referred to as an example international good practice in refugee integration. It will also contribute to the existing evidence-base on refugee integration and help to guide the future New Scots approach in Scotland. A range of potential questions for the evaluation have been identified, both in relation to the evaluation of the New Scots strategy (Table 1) and the evaluation of the AMIF-funded projects (Table 2), which provide a starting point for types of questions the evaluation should seek to answer. The questions draw on the evaluation questions set out in the MEL framework and cover three key areas: process, outcomes, and learning. It should be noted that the questions identified do not need to be taken as a definitive list, but should instead act as a guide to the sort of questions we would anticipate the evaluation to address in order to meet the overarching aims outlined above. Tenderers are free to modify, add to, or replace questions in the proposed list, providing that a clear rationale is given, and it is apparent how the alternatives will address the evaluation aims.
Notice Details
Publication & Lifecycle
- Open Contracting ID
- ocds-r6ebe6-0000657531
- Publication Source
- Public Contracts Scotland
- Latest Notice
- https://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP427248
- Current Stage
- Award
- All Stages
- Tender, Award
Procurement Classification
- Notice Type
- OJEU - F3 - Contract Award Notice
- Procurement Type
- Standard
- Procurement Category
- Services
- Procurement Method
- Open
- Procurement Method Details
- Open procedure
- Tender Suitability
- Not specified
- Awardee Scale
- Large
Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV)
- CPV Divisions
79 - Business services: law, marketing, consulting, recruitment, printing and security
-
- CPV Codes
79315000 - Social research services
Notice Value(s)
- Tender Value
- £150,000 £100K-£500K
- Lots Value
- £150,000 £100K-£500K
- Awards Value
- Not specified
- Contracts Value
- £147,701 £100K-£500K
Notice Dates
- Publication Date
- 9 Sep 20214 years ago
- Submission Deadline
- 23 Jul 2021Expired
- Future Notice Date
- Not specified
- Award Date
- 9 Sep 20214 years ago
- Contract Period
- 27 Sep 2021 - 30 Dec 2022 1-2 years
- Recurrence
- Not specified
Notice Status
- Tender Status
- Complete
- Lots Status
- Complete
- Awards Status
- Not Specified
- Contracts Status
- Active
Buyer & Supplier
Contracting Authority (Buyer)
- Main Buyer
- SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT
- Contact Name
- Available with D3 Tenders Premium →
- Contact Email
- Available with D3 Tenders Premium →
- Contact Phone
- Available with D3 Tenders Premium →
Buyer Location
- Locality
- GLASGOW
- Postcode
- G2 8LU
- Post Town
- Glasgow
- Country
- Scotland
-
- Major Region (ITL 1)
- TLM Scotland
- Basic Region (ITL 2)
- TLM1 East Central Scotland
- Small Region (ITL 3)
- TLM13 City of Edinburgh
- Delivery Location
- Not specified
-
- Local Authority
- City of Edinburgh
- Electoral Ward
- Leith
- Westminster Constituency
- Edinburgh North and Leith
Further Information
Notice Documents
-
https://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=JUN418515
New Scots Refugee Integration Evaluation - The aims of the evaluation are to: - Evaluate the New Scots strategy and approach, including whether the New Scots outcomes, objectives and actions are being met. - Assess the implementation of the AMIF-funded projects, including the extent to which they are achieving their intended outcomes. - Support funded projects to develop their own self-evaluation, and support sharing of learning between funded projects. - Generate insight, learning and recommendations from the projects and New Scots in relation to good practice, widening impact and innovation, including exploration of what has worked well and what hasn't. - Present and communicate findings and outputs in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including for policymakers and practitioners. The outputs of this work, alongside the other research and learning activity being carried out, will form part of a series of outputs from the AMIF-funded programme which are intended to contribute to a resource or 'exemplar' that will be useful to others working in this field, and which can be referred to as an example international good practice in refugee integration. It will also contribute to the existing evidence-base on refugee integration and help to guide the future New Scots approach in Scotland. A range of potential questions for the evaluation have been identified, both in relation to the evaluation of the New Scots strategy (Table 1) and the evaluation of the AMIF-funded projects (Table 2), which provide a starting point for types of questions the evaluation should seek to answer. The questions draw on the evaluation questions set out in the MEL framework and cover three key areas: process, outcomes, and learning. It should be noted that the questions identified do not need to be taken as a definitive list, but should instead act as a guide to the sort of questions we would anticipate the evaluation to address in order to meet the overarching aims outlined above. Tenderers are free to modify, add to, or replace questions in the proposed list, providing that a clear rationale is given, and it is apparent how the alternatives will address the evaluation aims. -
https://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP427248
New Scots Refugee Integration Evaluation - The aims of the evaluation are to: - Evaluate the New Scots strategy and approach, including whether the New Scots outcomes, objectives and actions are being met. - Assess the implementation of the AMIF-funded projects, including the extent to which they are achieving their intended outcomes. - Support funded projects to develop their own self-evaluation, and support sharing of learning between funded projects. - Generate insight, learning and recommendations from the projects and New Scots in relation to good practice, widening impact and innovation, including exploration of what has worked well and what hasn't. - Present and communicate findings and outputs in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including for policymakers and practitioners. The outputs of this work, alongside the other research and learning activity being carried out, will form part of a series of outputs from the AMIF-funded programme which are intended to contribute to a resource or 'exemplar' that will be useful to others working in this field, and which can be referred to as an example international good practice in refugee integration. It will also contribute to the existing evidence-base on refugee integration and help to guide the future New Scots approach in Scotland. A range of potential questions for the evaluation have been identified, both in relation to the evaluation of the New Scots strategy (Table 1) and the evaluation of the AMIF-funded projects (Table 2), which provide a starting point for types of questions the evaluation should seek to answer. The questions draw on the evaluation questions set out in the MEL framework and cover three key areas: process, outcomes, and learning. It should be noted that the questions identified do not need to be taken as a definitive list, but should instead act as a guide to the sort of questions we would anticipate the evaluation to address in order to meet the overarching aims outlined above. Tenderers are free to modify, add to, or replace questions in the proposed list, providing that a clear rationale is given, and it is apparent how the alternatives will address the evaluation aims.
Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS)
View full OCDS Record for this contracting process
The Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) is a framework designed to increase transparency and access to public procurement data in the public sector. It is widely used by governments and organisations worldwide to report on procurement processes and contracts.
{
"tag": [
"compiled"
],
"id": "ocds-r6ebe6-0000657531-2021-09-09T00:00:00Z",
"date": "2021-09-09T00:00:00Z",
"ocid": "ocds-r6ebe6-0000657531",
"initiationType": "tender",
"parties": [
{
"id": "org-11",
"name": "Scottish Government",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "Scottish Government"
},
"address": {
"streetAddress": "5 Atlantic Quay, 150 Broomielaw",
"locality": "Glasgow",
"region": "UKM",
"postalCode": "G2 8LU"
},
"contactPoint": {
"name": "David Box",
"email": "david.box@gov.scot",
"telephone": "+44 7919014604",
"url": "https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk"
},
"roles": [
"buyer",
"centralPurchasingBody",
"mediationBody",
"reviewContactPoint"
],
"details": {
"classifications": [
{
"id": "Ministry or any other national or federal authority, including their regional or local subdivisions",
"scheme": "TED_CA_TYPE"
},
{
"id": "01",
"description": "General public services",
"scheme": "COFOG"
}
],
"url": "http://www.gov.scot/"
}
},
{
"id": "org-75",
"name": "Edinburgh Sheriff Court Justice of the Peace 27",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "Edinburgh Sheriff Court Justice of the Peace 27"
},
"address": {
"streetAddress": "Chamber Street",
"locality": "Edinburgh",
"postalCode": "EH1 1LB"
},
"contactPoint": {
"url": "http://"
},
"roles": [
"reviewBody"
]
},
{
"id": "org-5",
"name": "Scottish Government",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "Scottish Government"
},
"address": {
"streetAddress": "4 Atlantic Quay, 70 York St",
"locality": "Glasgow",
"region": "UKM",
"postalCode": "G2 8EA"
},
"contactPoint": {
"name": "Gary Crombie",
"email": "Gary.Crombie@gov.scot",
"telephone": "+44 7392287522",
"url": "http://"
},
"roles": [
"buyer"
],
"details": {
"url": "http://www.scotland.gov.uk"
}
},
{
"id": "org-22",
"name": "Scottish Government",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "Scottish Government"
},
"address": {
"streetAddress": "4 Atlantic Quay, 70 York St",
"locality": "Glasgow",
"region": "UKM",
"postalCode": "G2 8EA"
},
"contactPoint": {
"email": "gordon.hutton@scotent.co.uk",
"telephone": "+44 1412420133"
},
"roles": [
"buyer"
]
},
{
"id": "org-176",
"name": "Scottish Government",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "Scottish Government"
},
"address": {
"streetAddress": "Area 3A, South, Victoria Quay, Leith",
"locality": "Edinburgh",
"region": "UKM",
"postalCode": "EH6 6QQ"
},
"contactPoint": {
"name": "Michael Brydon",
"email": "michael.brydon@gov.scot",
"telephone": "+44 1312443619",
"url": "http://"
},
"roles": [
"buyer"
],
"details": {
"classifications": [
{
"id": "Ministry or any other national or federal authority, including their regional or local subdivisions",
"scheme": "TED_CA_TYPE"
},
{
"id": "01",
"description": "General public services",
"scheme": "COFOG"
}
],
"url": "http://www.scotland.gov.uk"
}
},
{
"id": "org-203",
"name": "NatCen Social Research",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "NatCen Social Research"
},
"address": {
"streetAddress": "35 Northampton Square, London",
"locality": "London",
"region": "UK",
"postalCode": "EC1V 0AX"
},
"contactPoint": {
"email": "paul.bradshaw@scotcen.org.uk",
"telephone": "+44 1312400230"
},
"roles": [
"supplier"
],
"details": {
"scale": "large",
"url": "http://"
}
},
{
"id": "org-204",
"name": "Edinburgh Sheriff Court Justice of the Peace 27",
"identifier": {
"legalName": "Edinburgh Sheriff Court Justice of the Peace 27"
},
"address": {
"streetAddress": "Chamber Street",
"locality": "Edinburgh",
"postalCode": "EH1 1LB"
},
"contactPoint": {
"url": "http://"
},
"roles": [
"reviewBody"
]
}
],
"buyer": {
"name": "Scottish Government",
"id": "org-176"
},
"tender": {
"id": "Case Ref: 560741",
"title": "New Scots Refugee Integration Evaluation",
"description": "The aims of the evaluation are to: - Evaluate the New Scots strategy and approach, including whether the New Scots outcomes, objectives and actions are being met. - Assess the implementation of the AMIF-funded projects, including the extent to which they are achieving their intended outcomes. - Support funded projects to develop their own self-evaluation, and support sharing of learning between funded projects. - Generate insight, learning and recommendations from the projects and New Scots in relation to good practice, widening impact and innovation, including exploration of what has worked well and what hasn't. - Present and communicate findings and outputs in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including for policymakers and practitioners. The outputs of this work, alongside the other research and learning activity being carried out, will form part of a series of outputs from the AMIF-funded programme which are intended to contribute to a resource or 'exemplar' that will be useful to others working in this field, and which can be referred to as an example international good practice in refugee integration. It will also contribute to the existing evidence-base on refugee integration and help to guide the future New Scots approach in Scotland. A range of potential questions for the evaluation have been identified, both in relation to the evaluation of the New Scots strategy (Table 1) and the evaluation of the AMIF-funded projects (Table 2), which provide a starting point for types of questions the evaluation should seek to answer. The questions draw on the evaluation questions set out in the MEL framework and cover three key areas: process, outcomes, and learning. It should be noted that the questions identified do not need to be taken as a definitive list, but should instead act as a guide to the sort of questions we would anticipate the evaluation to address in order to meet the overarching aims outlined above. Tenderers are free to modify, add to, or replace questions in the proposed list, providing that a clear rationale is given, and it is apparent how the alternatives will address the evaluation aims.",
"status": "complete",
"items": [
{
"id": "1",
"additionalClassifications": [
{
"id": "79315000",
"scheme": "CPV"
}
],
"deliveryAddresses": [
{
"region": "UK"
},
{
"region": "UK"
}
],
"relatedLot": "1"
}
],
"value": {
"amount": 150000,
"currency": "GBP"
},
"procurementMethod": "open",
"procurementMethodDetails": "Open procedure",
"mainProcurementCategory": "services",
"submissionMethod": [
"electronicSubmission"
],
"submissionMethodDetails": "https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/",
"tenderPeriod": {
"endDate": "2021-07-23T12:00:00Z"
},
"awardPeriod": {
"startDate": "2021-07-23T12:30:00Z"
},
"documents": [
{
"id": "JUN418515",
"documentType": "contractNotice",
"title": "New Scots Refugee Integration Evaluation",
"description": "The aims of the evaluation are to: - Evaluate the New Scots strategy and approach, including whether the New Scots outcomes, objectives and actions are being met. - Assess the implementation of the AMIF-funded projects, including the extent to which they are achieving their intended outcomes. - Support funded projects to develop their own self-evaluation, and support sharing of learning between funded projects. - Generate insight, learning and recommendations from the projects and New Scots in relation to good practice, widening impact and innovation, including exploration of what has worked well and what hasn't. - Present and communicate findings and outputs in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including for policymakers and practitioners. The outputs of this work, alongside the other research and learning activity being carried out, will form part of a series of outputs from the AMIF-funded programme which are intended to contribute to a resource or 'exemplar' that will be useful to others working in this field, and which can be referred to as an example international good practice in refugee integration. It will also contribute to the existing evidence-base on refugee integration and help to guide the future New Scots approach in Scotland. A range of potential questions for the evaluation have been identified, both in relation to the evaluation of the New Scots strategy (Table 1) and the evaluation of the AMIF-funded projects (Table 2), which provide a starting point for types of questions the evaluation should seek to answer. The questions draw on the evaluation questions set out in the MEL framework and cover three key areas: process, outcomes, and learning. It should be noted that the questions identified do not need to be taken as a definitive list, but should instead act as a guide to the sort of questions we would anticipate the evaluation to address in order to meet the overarching aims outlined above. Tenderers are free to modify, add to, or replace questions in the proposed list, providing that a clear rationale is given, and it is apparent how the alternatives will address the evaluation aims.",
"url": "https://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=JUN418515",
"format": "text/html"
},
{
"id": "SEP427248",
"documentType": "awardNotice",
"title": "New Scots Refugee Integration Evaluation",
"description": "The aims of the evaluation are to: - Evaluate the New Scots strategy and approach, including whether the New Scots outcomes, objectives and actions are being met. - Assess the implementation of the AMIF-funded projects, including the extent to which they are achieving their intended outcomes. - Support funded projects to develop their own self-evaluation, and support sharing of learning between funded projects. - Generate insight, learning and recommendations from the projects and New Scots in relation to good practice, widening impact and innovation, including exploration of what has worked well and what hasn't. - Present and communicate findings and outputs in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including for policymakers and practitioners. The outputs of this work, alongside the other research and learning activity being carried out, will form part of a series of outputs from the AMIF-funded programme which are intended to contribute to a resource or 'exemplar' that will be useful to others working in this field, and which can be referred to as an example international good practice in refugee integration. It will also contribute to the existing evidence-base on refugee integration and help to guide the future New Scots approach in Scotland. A range of potential questions for the evaluation have been identified, both in relation to the evaluation of the New Scots strategy (Table 1) and the evaluation of the AMIF-funded projects (Table 2), which provide a starting point for types of questions the evaluation should seek to answer. The questions draw on the evaluation questions set out in the MEL framework and cover three key areas: process, outcomes, and learning. It should be noted that the questions identified do not need to be taken as a definitive list, but should instead act as a guide to the sort of questions we would anticipate the evaluation to address in order to meet the overarching aims outlined above. Tenderers are free to modify, add to, or replace questions in the proposed list, providing that a clear rationale is given, and it is apparent how the alternatives will address the evaluation aims.",
"url": "https://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP427248",
"format": "text/html"
}
],
"lots": [
{
"id": "1",
"description": "The successful supplier will fulfil the aims of the evaluation which are to: - Evaluate the New Scots strategy and approach, including whether the New Scots outcomes, objectives and actions are being met. - Assess the implementation of the AMIF-funded projects, including the extent to which they are achieving their intended outcomes. - Support funded projects to develop their own self-evaluation, and support sharing of learning between funded projects. - Generate insight, learning and recommendations from the projects and New Scots in relation to good practice, widening impact and innovation, including exploration of what has worked well and what hasn't. - Present and communicate findings and outputs in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including for policymakers and practitioners. The outputs of this work, alongside the other research and learning activity being carried out, will form part of a series of outputs from the AMIF-funded programme which are intended to contribute to a resource or 'exemplar' that will be useful to others working in this field, and which can be referred to as an example international good practice in refugee integration. It will also contribute to the existing evidence-base on refugee integration and help to guide the future New Scots approach in Scotland. A range of potential questions for the evaluation have been identified, both in relation to the evaluation of the New Scots strategy (Table 1) and the evaluation of the AMIF-funded projects (Table 2), which provide a starting point for types of questions the evaluation should seek to answer. The questions draw on the evaluation questions set out in the MEL framework and cover three key areas: process, outcomes, and learning. It should be noted that the questions identified do not need to be taken as a definitive list, but should instead act as a guide to the sort of questions we would anticipate the evaluation to address in order to meet the overarching aims outlined above. Tenderers are free to modify, add to, or replace questions in the proposed list, providing that a clear rationale is given, and it is apparent how the alternatives will address the evaluation aims.",
"status": "complete",
"value": {
"amount": 150000,
"currency": "GBP"
},
"awardCriteria": {
"criteria": [
{
"type": "quality",
"name": "As set out in the ITT",
"description": "80"
},
{
"type": "price",
"description": "20"
}
]
},
"hasOptions": false,
"submissionTerms": {
"variantPolicy": "notAllowed"
},
"contractPeriod": {
"startDate": "2021-09-27T00:00:00Z",
"endDate": "2022-12-30T00:00:00Z"
},
"hasRenewal": false
}
],
"bidOpening": {
"date": "2021-07-23T12:30:00Z"
},
"communication": {
"atypicalToolUrl": "https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/"
},
"contractTerms": {
"electronicInvoicingPolicy": "allowed"
},
"coveredBy": [
"GPA"
],
"selectionCriteria": {
"criteria": [
{
"type": "economic",
"description": "Bidders must demonstrate a Current Ratio of 1 (one) or more. Current Ratio will be calculated as follows: net current assets divided by net current liabilities Minimum level(s) of standards required: Bidders must have in place the following minimum insurance levels: - Public Liability Insurance - 1,000,000 GBP and unlimited in total; - Professional Indemnity Insurance - 1,000,000 GBP - Employer's Liability Insurance - 5,000,000 GBP"
}
]
},
"submissionTerms": {
"languages": [
"en"
],
"bidValidityPeriod": {
"durationInDays": 180
}
},
"classification": {
"id": "79315000",
"scheme": "CPV"
},
"hasRecurrence": false,
"legalBasis": {
"id": "32014L0024",
"scheme": "CELEX"
},
"amendments": [
{
"id": "amd-4",
"description": "tender return deadline has been extended by 1 week",
"unstructuredChanges": [
{
"oldValue": {
"date": "2021-07-23T12:00:00Z"
},
"newValue": {
"date": "2021-07-30T12:00:00Z"
},
"where": {
"section": "IV.2.2",
"label": "Time limit"
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "amd-44",
"description": "need to be updated to reflect additional weeks extension to 30th July 2021",
"unstructuredChanges": [
{
"oldValue": {
"date": "2021-07-23T12:30:00Z"
},
"newValue": {
"date": "2021-07-30T12:30:00Z"
},
"where": {
"section": "IV.2.7",
"label": "Conditions for opening of tenders"
}
}
]
}
]
},
"language": "EN",
"description": "(SC Ref:666682)",
"links": [
{
"rel": "canonical",
"href": "https://api.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/v1/Notice?id=ocds-r6ebe6-0000657531"
},
{
"rel": "canonical",
"href": "https://api.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/v1/Notice?id=ocds-r6ebe6-0000657531"
},
{
"rel": "canonical",
"href": "https://api.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/v1/Notice?id=ocds-r6ebe6-0000657531"
},
{
"rel": "canonical",
"href": "https://api.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/v1/Notice?id=ocds-r6ebe6-0000657531"
}
],
"noticetype": "OJEU - F3 - Contract Award Notice",
"awards": [
{
"id": "Case Ref: 560741-1",
"suppliers": [
{
"id": "org-203",
"name": "NatCen Social Research"
}
],
"relatedLots": [
"1"
],
"hasSubcontracting": true
}
],
"contracts": [
{
"id": "Case Ref: 560741-1",
"awardID": "Case Ref: 560741-1",
"status": "active",
"value": {
"amount": 147701,
"currency": "GBP"
},
"dateSigned": "2021-09-09T00:00:00Z"
}
],
"relatedProcesses": [
{
"id": "1",
"relationship": [
"planning"
],
"scheme": "EU-OJ",
"identifier": "2021/S 118-311571"
}
],
"bids": {
"statistics": [
{
"id": "593",
"measure": "bids",
"value": 1,
"relatedLot": "1"
},
{
"id": "594",
"measure": "smeBids",
"value": 0,
"relatedLot": "1"
},
{
"id": "595",
"measure": "foreignBidsFromEU",
"value": 0,
"relatedLot": "1"
},
{
"id": "596",
"measure": "foreignBidsFromNonEU",
"value": 1,
"relatedLot": "1"
},
{
"id": "597",
"measure": "electronicBids",
"value": 1,
"relatedLot": "1"
}
]
}
}